January 7, 2012
We know the ultra-conservative think tank, Heritage Foundation, came up with the idea.
We know that GOP frontrunner employed it in RomneyCare and declared it a “fundamentally conservative” idea.
We know Newt Gingrich also advocated for it.
And now. . . Rick Santorum. Per a 1994 Pennsylvania news article:
Santorum and Watkins would require individuals to buy health insurance rather than forcing employers to pay for employee benefits. Both oppose abortion services and support limits on malpractice awards. Santorum says non-economic damages should not exceed $250,000, adjusted annually for inflation, and lawyers’ contingency fees should be capped at 25 percent.
I still ask how Alabama GOPers support these guys after their rhetoric through the years:
So how do Mike Hubbard and Mike Rogers overlook this “push toward a socialistic-leaning government in this country” with RomneyCare and its “socialist” mandates which “will dampen too many employers’ ability to hire and expand” and “threaten job creation and stability across East Alabama” and “which force citizens to purchase something they do not wish to purchase, a mandate which has never been previously demanded of the populace.“
December 23, 2011
Posted by greg varner under Politics
| Tags: gary
Leave a Comment
Gary Hart accurately identifies the danger of a Newt presidency:
For one or two of us, Mr. Gingrich’s most troubling characteristics are his attention span of a precocious 3-year-old and his latent tendency toward grandiosity. Perhaps in coming years he will learn to be able to sit down for more than five minutes at a time and concentrate and focus on a single thought. That would certainly be helpful in the White House. At present, President Gingrich would make Bill Clinton look sedate. But a president with a messianic sense of destiny and conviction that he is on earth to fundamentally alter history, with a comparison of himself to Winston Churchill (who never exhibited such a sense), is nothing less than a dangerous thing.
Churn up a mixture of messianic destiny, widespread contempt for those who differ, and an almost manic restlessness and we might soon have a nominee for president who, if elected, would provide many Americans with a sudden interest in a rather long sabbatical in more traditional and predictable democracies, especially those without nuclear arsenal.
Newt spells Robespierre.
October 24, 2011
Posted by greg varner under Immigration
| Tags: gingrich
In Arizona, Newt provides a surprise stance on immigration:
My stand is that we should have absolute control over the border,” Gingrich said. “We should have English as the official language of government.”
Although unlike many of his Republican counterparts, Gingrich has a positive plan for citizens here illegally. He wants to modernize the deportation laws
“[Illegal immigrants] should pay a penalty, but they should then get a Red Card which would not put them on the road for citizenship, but it would bring them in from illegality,” he said. “It would make them part of the community, and their children and grandchildren could aspire to become American citizens.”
If Newt continues his comeback within the Republican Party primary, he will have to walk this one back.